Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves public discourse as it addresses international trade policies and potential economic impacts. It reflects a tense diplomatic situation with potential global repercussions.
- The statement by SEC Bessent could be seen as escalating tensions rather than promoting peaceful resolution, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on threats rather than dialogue, which does not promote understanding or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead issuing a warning that could be perceived as a threat. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.