The statement criticizes Bloomberg for allegedly wanting Substack to censor controversial content. It uses strong language, such as 'pathetic swipe' and 'snobs,' indicating a confrontational tone.
- The statement uses derogatory language, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of terms like 'snobs' could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could be seen as using influence to challenge perceived censorship, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.