Ayanna Pressley

Rank 2 of 47
|
Score 234

The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public policy issue concerning the allocation of Title X funds for family planning services. It involves a collective action by House Democrats urging a government department to reverse a decision impacting public health and family planning.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy issue, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By advocating for the restoration of funds for family planning services, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the needs of those who rely on these services. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement presents a collective action and does not engage in personal attacks, adhering to constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the influence of House Democrats to advocate for a policy change that could benefit society, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using a platform to address a public issue. [+1]