Jill Stien

The statement expresses a critical view of a political figure and suggests systemic issues within the political system. It uses strong language to convey dissatisfaction with both major political parties, implying they serve corporate interests rather than the public. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, aiming to provoke thought about political reform.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual mentioned, engaging in a personal attack rather than focusing on policy or actions. [-2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack without offering a solution or engaging in meaningful discussion. [-2]