Peter Diamandis

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 92

The statement critiques the current state of search engines and their reliance on advertising revenue, suggesting that the pursuit of AI-driven solutions may ultimately harm their business model. It raises a public issue regarding the balance between user experience and commercial interests in digital platforms.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others, but its provocative language could be seen as aggressive.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a metaphor of 'choking' and 'cannibalism' which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a metaphor that could be interpreted as a personal attack on the entities involved. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement raises awareness about a public issue, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but the tone may detract from constructive engagement. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its critique.