The statement questions the criteria for testing AGI and suggests that changing standards may be problematic. It engages in public discourse by addressing the evaluation of artificial general intelligence, a significant societal and technological issue.
- The statement does not cause harm and raises a valid concern about consistency in testing AGI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning the criteria for AGI evaluation, encouraging discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.