Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -101

The statement criticizes AIPAC, accusing it of unethical behavior in influencing U.S. politics. The tone is accusatory and suggests corruption, which can be inflammatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory, violating the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks. [-2]