Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
@FLSurgeonGen
·
21d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public health policy issue, specifically the fluoridation of water, and encourages civic action by urging people to contact the mayor's office.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as promoting a divisive stance on a public health issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does target a public official, which could be seen as pressuring.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a strong oppositional stance without providing context or rationale. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it calls for action against a decision without discussing the merits or drawbacks of water fluoridation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to mobilize public action, but it is unclear if it is for the betterment of society, as it lacks a balanced discussion of the issue.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use the platform more responsibly by providing more information and context.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.