Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Secretary Kristi Noem
@Sec_Noem
·
49d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to immigration, citizenship, and US-Israel relations. It challenges the characterization of Mahmoud Khalil's views and criticizes the influence of AIPAC on US politics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone that could escalate tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but borders on disrespect by implying financial influence on political opinions. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by suggesting financial motivations behind political views, rather than focusing on the argument itself. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.