Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement appears to address trade policies, specifically tariffs, which is a public issue. The tone is somewhat informal and fragmented, possibly indicating a critique or commentary on the complexity and inconsistency of tariff policies, particularly in relation to China.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the fragmented nature could lead to misunderstandings about the policy implications.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks clarity and does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It seems more critical than constructive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not facilitate constructive dialogue due to its lack of clarity.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not clearly use influence for societal betterment, as it does not provide a clear stance or solution. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but lacks responsibility and integrity due to its unclear and potentially misleading nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.