Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a serious political issue regarding the refusal to comply with a Supreme Court ruling, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is defensive and dismissive, potentially undermining the rule of law.
- The statement may cause harm by dismissing a legal ruling, potentially undermining trust in the judicial system. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the judicial process, potentially encouraging disregard for legal authority. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses dismissive language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence in a way that may not promote societal betterment by dismissing legal obligations. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.