Reposted by Gavin Newsom
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the application of legal precedents in the context of tariffs and court decisions involving past presidents. It questions the consistency of judicial decisions and implies a critique of the current application of laws.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on legal and judicial processes, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of judicial decisions without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question legal interpretations and judicial consistency, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.