Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement criticizes individuals for allegedly contradicting their stance on free speech by deporting people and expanding hate speech codes. It questions their integrity and consistency, suggesting hypocrisy. The tone is accusatory and challenges the actions of those involved.
- The statement aims to hold individuals accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by exposing perceived hypocrisy.Ā [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in personal attacks but questions actions, respecting privacy and dignity to some extent.Ā [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting perceived contradictions in actions versus stated beliefs.Ā [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the consistency of actions with stated principles, avoiding ad hominem attacks.Ā [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.