Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the actions of political figures regarding Guantanamo Bay, suggesting a continuation of controversial policies. It implies a lack of accountability and transparency in government actions, using a critical and accusatory tone.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using terms like 'disappeared' and 'gulag' which could be seen as hyperbolic and disrespectful. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using accusatory language without offering solutions or engaging in meaningful discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.