The statement critiques Harvard's financial practices, suggesting it operates more like a hedge fund than an educational institution. It questions the university's non-profit status and government subsidies, implying misuse of these benefits.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by using strong language like 'monstrous' and 'disguised,' which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of Harvard's financial practices but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack on the institution rather than a constructive critique. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.