Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47

Score -27

Yeah, that’s not what DEI is, or what people find objectionable about it. Forcing applicants to write “diversity statements” — compelled political speech — is a better example. The state also can’t be subsidizing practices like “affinity groups.”

Barbara Ann Stein

@BarbaraAnnStein

48d

@Mackis1174 @hikergal123 @mtaibbi So would you permit a course on 18th century slavery in the US or on 20th century Irish American authors? How would you determine DEI and impose it on curriculum?

4/19/2025, 3:37:17 PM

The statement critiques DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives, particularly focusing on the requirement for diversity statements and the funding of affinity groups. It suggests these practices are forms of compelled political speech and questions state funding for such initiatives.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement challenges DEI practices, which could be seen as harmful by those who support these initiatives, but it does not use harmful language.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech, though it is critical of DEI practices.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards DEI initiatives, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of DEI practices but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]