Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47

Score -20

-3

Generations of people sacrificed (often with their lives) to end racial segregation, and especially to purge it from the law and public policy. It’s an outrage to ask the taxpayer to subsidize things like racially segregated dorms or graduation ceremonies.

RainierSixPac 🤌🍊🤡

@RainierSixPac

46d

@mtaibbi What’s objectionable about affinity groups? Often they are a supportive space for people who are very underrepresented in a company-often trailblazers who are integrating an industry. These include things like ‘women in technology’ groups, not racially based

4/19/2025, 3:55:45 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal issue of racial segregation and public funding for practices perceived as racially segregated. It critiques the use of taxpayer money for such practices, invoking historical sacrifices to end segregation.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it could be perceived as dismissive of the supportive role affinity groups play for underrepresented communities.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those who benefit from affinity groups. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards the reasons for affinity groups, focusing instead on the financial aspect. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue by dismissing the potential benefits of affinity groups. [-1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses influence to argue for a societal change regarding public funding, but it does not consider the potential positive impacts of affinity groups.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on public funding and affinity groups, but it could use more responsible language to foster dialogue.