Gilles Jaunes Deleuze
@CarolinaDellaV3
·
35d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing legal aspects of obstructing pedestrian traffic and its implications within disorderly conduct laws. It references personal observations and legal texts, contributing to a broader conversation about public order and protest rights.
- The statement does not directly harm others but highlights legal consequences of certain actions, which can inform public understanding.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By sharing observations and legal references, the statement promotes understanding of legal frameworks, though it lacks empathetic engagement with differing views. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but is part of a broader conversation that includes some hostile exchanges.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.