Gilles Jaunes Deleuze
@CarolinaDellaV3
·
35d
The statement engages in a debate about the legality of obstructing pedestrian traffic, referencing legal statutes and court rulings. It challenges the opposing view with a focus on legal evidence, aiming to clarify misunderstandings about the law.
- The statement strives to clarify legal misconceptions, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement uses a factual and evidence-based approach, which can promote understanding, though the tone is somewhat confrontational. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement challenges the opposing view without resorting to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the argument rather than the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.