Mike Johnson

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 55

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of educational content in schools, specifically addressing the inclusion of topics related to gender ideology and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The tone is assertive and dismissive of DEI and gender topics, framing them as 'nonsense' and not part of 'common sense' education priorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as doing harm by dismissing DEI and gender topics as 'nonsense,' potentially marginalizing those who value these topics. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the dismissive tone towards DEI and gender topics could be seen as disrespectful to those who support these initiatives. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those who support DEI and gender topics, instead dismissing them outright. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it dismisses opposing views as 'nonsense' without engaging with their merits. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to express an opinion but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity by dismissing complex issues as 'nonsense.' [-1]