Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a policy decision regarding the Navy's climate action plan, emphasizing military readiness over environmental regulations. It reflects a prioritization of defense capabilities and critiques the previous administration's approach.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of environmental concerns, which some may argue could have long-term harmful effects. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards environmental issues, focusing instead on military strength. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the previous administration's policy but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.