Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement criticizes a judicial decision and sanctuary cities, framing them as protective of criminals. It reflects a strong opinion on immigration policy and judicial authority.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful by labeling sanctuary cities as 'sanctuary for criminals,' potentially inciting fear or misunderstanding. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved, particularly the judge, by labeling them as 'activist' in a derogatory manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using a dismissive tone towards the judicial decision. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.