Mac @macposting.bsky.social
@macs_posts
·
11d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of voter ID laws, which is a significant public policy debate. The tone is critical, suggesting that the lack of ID requirements for voting in some states is illogical, especially in the context of changes made during the Covid pandemic.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does imply criticism of current policies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on policy rather than individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses opposing views as 'silly' and 'absurd.' [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views without addressing their merits. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but it could use more responsible language to foster dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.