🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 USA lover
@gothamcapital1
·
284d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to economic policy, workforce skills, and fiscal strategies. It critiques the expectation that journalists must provide solutions when highlighting problems and suggests investment in domestic skills and targeted fiscal policies. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, particularly in the use of 'stupid' to describe an opposing view.
- The statement uses the word 'stupid,' which could be seen as harmful or dismissive, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting specific areas for policy focus, such as investing in skills and targeted fiscal policies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by responding to a question about policy changes, but the use of 'stupid' could be seen as a personal attack, slightly violating this principle. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to suggest policy directions, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss public issues responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.