In reply to:
Ronald P. Karlsberg MD FACP FAHA FACC MSCCT |
@RonKarlsbergMD
·
23d
The statement is a response to a tweet by @RonKarlsbergMD and mentions a 'key item of the MAHA agenda.' Without additional context or information about the content of the original tweet or the MAHA agenda, it is difficult to determine if this constitutes public discourse. However, the mention of an agenda suggests a potential engagement with public issues. If the agenda relates to societal issues or policies, it could be considered public discourse. The statement itself is neutral and supportive, acknowledging the importance of the agenda item.
- The statement does no harm and is supportive, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the importance of the agenda item, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses influence to support an agenda, which could be for the betterment of society, depending on the agenda's nature. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.