Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement discusses U.S. foreign policy and its impact on Israeli actions in Gaza, touching on international relations and political dynamics. It implies a lack of pressure from the Biden administration on Israel regarding a ceasefire, suggesting a favorable stance towards Israeli actions. The tone is critical of the U.S. administration's approach, highlighting Israeli leaders' satisfaction with the situation.
- The statement could potentially harm diplomatic relations by highlighting a lack of pressure for peace, which may be seen as neglecting humanitarian concerns. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but may not fully respect the dignity of those affected by the conflict, as it focuses on political maneuvering rather than human impact. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on political strategy rather than the humanitarian aspect of the conflict. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the U.S. administration's foreign policy but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.