The statement discusses the partisanship of bureaucrats, suggesting that career employees may pursue ideological agendas. It implies skepticism about the neutrality of civil rights lawyers, especially in light of recent resignations following a shift in focus within the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
- The statement could potentially harm by questioning the integrity of career bureaucrats without specific evidence, which may contribute to public distrust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but may not fully respect the dignity of the individuals involved by implying partisanship without specific examples. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it generalizes about bureaucrats' motivations. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or specific evidence to support its claims. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.