The statement is a public announcement regarding a policy decision on border security funding, which is a significant public issue. It presents specific figures related to the funding and implies a stance on border security measures.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, but the implications of the policy could be debated in terms of potential harm or benefit.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily informational and lacks a nuanced discussion of the impacts of the policy.
 [-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, as it is focused on presenting information about funding.
 [+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to inform the public about a policy decision, which can be seen as contributing to civic dialogue, but it does not explicitly aim for societal betterment beyond the stated security goals.
 [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech by sharing information about a public policy decision, but it could be more responsible by providing context or addressing potential concerns.