Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
L., MA
@leslieleeiii
·
57d
The statement criticizes political figures and their actions regarding healthcare policy during a pandemic, engaging in public discourse about healthcare reform and political accountability.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize public figures, which is generally acceptable in public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived political failures, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for healthcare reform. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss public policy, but the tone could be more responsible and constructive.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.