Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement critiques the political system, specifically the two-party system, and suggests that people are manipulated into choosing between two undesirable options rather than pursuing more idealistic goals. It implies a call to action for political change and challenges the status quo, which constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others, but the use of 'brainwashed' could be seen as dismissive or derogatory towards those who participate in the current political system. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes the idea of striving for the 'greater good,' which aligns with promoting understanding and compassion, but it lacks a constructive approach to achieving this.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes the political system and those who support it without engaging in personal attacks, but the term 'brainwashed' could be seen as an ad hominem attack on individuals' intelligence or autonomy. [-1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech by challenging the political status quo and encourages a discussion on political reform, using the platform to question societal norms. [+1]