The statement criticizes the decision to cut grants for mental health services in schools, arguing it harms children by denying them necessary support. It advocates for increased investment in trauma-informed care.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by the policy change, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the importance of mental health support for children. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses strong language ('cruelty is the point') which could be seen as a personal attack, potentially violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.