Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98

The statement critiques an event related to antisemitism and free speech, suggesting a lack of true democratic values by the host organization. It implies a restriction on free speech, particularly regarding the 'Free Palestine' movement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about free speech, which could be seen as promoting awareness of potential harm in restricting dialogue. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It criticizes an organization, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated, potentially violating privacy and dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding of free speech issues, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The critique of the organization could be seen as a personal attack, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By addressing free speech issues, the statement uses its platform to highlight societal concerns. [+1]