The statement and conversation involve a political action that led to the cancellation of a grant related to social justice in education. The tone is congratulatory towards the cancellation, suggesting a stance against the grant's objectives.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement may cause harm by celebrating the cancellation of a grant aimed at improving educational opportunities, potentially affecting those who would benefit from it.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of those involved in the grant, as it publicly celebrates its cancellation without engaging with the stakeholders.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the grant's goals without constructive dialogue.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement lacks constructive criticism and does not engage in dialogue with those who support the grant, instead opting for a celebratory tone.
[-1]