The statement is politically charged, expressing a critical view of certain governors' policies on sanctuary states. It implies that these policies endanger public safety by protecting illegal immigrants from enforcement. The tone is confrontational and anticipates a contentious hearing.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement may cause harm by framing the issue in a way that could incite fear or anger, potentially leading to divisiveness.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It does not respect the dignity of the governors mentioned, as it implies they are jeopardizing safety without acknowledging their perspective.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, as it uses charged language and does not engage with opposing views respectfully.
[-2]