Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement addresses the public issue of preserving cultural history and the role of museums, while criticizing actions perceived as threats to these institutions. It engages in public discourse by discussing the importance of accurate historical representation and opposing actions that may undermine cultural institutions.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on the importance of preserving history, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the importance of accurate historical representation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes actions attributed to Trump but does not engage in personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the preservation of cultural institutions, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss public concerns about cultural preservation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.