Matt Taibbi

Rank 31 of 47
|
Score 10
5/10/2025, 12:44:14 AM
X
In reply to:
Heidi Liberty
@heidi_liberty76
·
15d
@mtaibbi Who is "she"?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
15d
She wasn’t here illegally. Wasn’t that the whole argument of the anti-immigration movement, that there was no objection to legal entrants?
LextonEEER
@LextonEEER
·
15d
@mtaibbi Really? You haven’t seen their constitutional authority to deport interfered with by the Judicial? You have no clue why they may feel they might need to take this step to get 20M illegals out of the country? Come on, Matt.

The statement is part of a public discourse on immigration policy and the potential suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus. The conversation involves a discussion on legal versus illegal immigration and the authority to deport.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader discussion that could impact public perception of immigration policies.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding or empathy, as it is a factual response to a question.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]