In reply to:
The statement and image engage in public discourse by commenting on the perceived shift in political ideologies over time. The tone is provocative and intended to highlight changes in societal norms and political views. It may imply criticism of current liberal ideologies by contrasting them with past views.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by labeling modern liberals as 'dangerous lunatics,' which may perpetuate divisiveness. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others by using derogatory language. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a provocative comparison. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.