In reply to:
Mike Lee
@BasedMikeLee
·
2d
Ian Miles Cheong
@stillgray
·
2d
The statement and its context involve a discussion on racial tensions and violence in South Africa, specifically referencing a chant that is perceived as promoting violence against a particular group. The tone of the conversation is dismissive and sarcastic, which can exacerbate tensions rather than promote understanding.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it appears to trivialize a serious issue of racial violence. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others and could be seen as engaging in harmful rhetoric. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using sarcasm that may inflame tensions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses sarcasm, which can be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.