The statement questions the rationale behind limiting states' ability to regulate AI, engaging in a public discourse about state versus federal regulation of technology.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not use harmful language and is phrased as a question, which does not inherently cause harm.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement invites dialogue by questioning a policy decision, which can lead to constructive criticism and discussion.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement uses free speech to question a policy decision, which is a responsible use of a platform to engage in civic dialogue.
[+1]