In reply to:
Jesse Peltan
@JessePeltan
·
124d
The statement is part of a conversation about the feasibility of bringing a terawatt of compute online, which involves public discourse on energy production and technology infrastructure. The reply 'Exactly' by @JessePeltan indicates agreement with the previous statement about chip manufacturing being a limiting factor in achieving this goal.
- The statement does no harm and is a simple agreement, adhering to the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By agreeing with a statement that provides insight into energy production challenges, it promotes understanding of the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with a point made in the discussion, without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement contributes to a discussion on energy and technology, which are important societal issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to engage in a meaningful discussion about energy and technology responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.