Reposted by Kekius Maximus
The statement and accompanying conversation engage in public discourse by addressing issues of alleged bias and discrimination within a public institution, UCLA, and its implications on broader societal concerns such as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the medical profession.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by perpetuating divisive narratives without providing evidence or context, which may incite further polarization. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does risk undermining the dignity of individuals or groups by making broad accusations of bias without substantiation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a one-sided view without encouraging dialogue or consideration of multiple perspectives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents an accusatory tone without inviting discussion or providing evidence for the claims made. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived issue, but it does so in a manner that may not contribute positively to societal betterment due to its divisive nature. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, as it lacks context and evidence, potentially leading to misinformation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.