In reply to:
Whole Mars Catalog
@WholeMarsBlog
·
134d
The statement and images engage in public discourse by discussing Tesla's governance and board appointments. The initial statement challenges the accuracy of claims about Tesla's board member, suggesting a focus on improving governance rather than harming it. The reply with the stock image implies a positive market response, possibly countering the negative narrative.
- The statement aims to correct misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on factual corrections rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a counter-narrative to the negative portrayal. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the argument's validity without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.