Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a discussion on international trade relations and economic impacts, which are public issues. The tone is assertive, with the speaker taking credit for a positive market reaction and suggesting a significant geopolitical impact. The statement lacks detailed evidence or explanation, which could limit understanding and constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but lacks evidence to support its claims, which could mislead. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy due to its lack of detailed explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue as it lacks evidence and context. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.