Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement critiques the media's handling of information regarding a political figure, suggesting a shift from dismissing claims as conspiracy theories to acknowledging them as facts. It expresses concern over the impact on journalistic credibility.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived media failures, which could be seen as an attempt to hold the media accountable, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by promoting transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not engaging in personal attacks but critiques media practices, aligning with respecting dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by encouraging scrutiny of media practices, though it may also polarize opinions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the media, avoiding personal attacks, and focuses on systemic issues. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.