In reply to:
Kaizen D. Asiedu
@thatsKAIZEN
·
135d
Resist the Mainstream
@ResisttheMS
·
135d
The statement 'True' is a brief affirmation of a previous comment that criticizes a law regarding misgendering and deadnaming. The original comment argues that such laws are a form of speech and thought policing and could lead to discrimination rather than prevent it. This discussion touches on issues of free speech, gender identity, and discrimination.
- The statement does not directly promote harm, but it supports a viewpoint that could be seen as dismissive of the experiences of transgender individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of transgender individuals by supporting a viewpoint that could be perceived as invalidating their identities. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or address counterarguments, instead simply affirming a controversial stance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a viewpoint that may not contribute positively to societal understanding of gender issues. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement touches on free speech but does not engage with the complexity of balancing free speech with protection against discrimination.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.