In reply to:
Kostas Papapaschalis
@KPapapaschalis
·
6d
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
6d
The statement is part of a conversation about the future impact of artificial general intelligence (AGI) on various industries, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with societal issues related to technology and its implications.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions, as it is a speculative question about the future of technology.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on a hypothetical scenario rather than fostering a deeper understanding of the issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.