Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a public issue related to immigration policy and sanctuary cities, indicating a shift in enforcement practices. The tone suggests a critical view of sanctuary policies and implies a forced compliance with federal immigration authorities.
- The statement may contribute to harm by using charged language like 'forced' and 'illegal alien,' which can be inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, using terms that may be considered derogatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents the situation in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it lacks a balanced perspective and uses language that could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.