Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement is a political message promoting a legislative act focused on border security. It emphasizes increased deportations, completion of the border wall, and financial incentives for border enforcement personnel. The tone is assertive and nationalistic, aiming to rally support for the bill by framing it as a means to 'take the country back.'
- The statement does not directly incite harm, but the aggressive tone and focus on deportations could contribute to a divisive atmosphere, potentially causing harm to immigrant communities. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the language used could be perceived as lacking respect for the dignity of immigrants. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on enforcement and security rather than addressing the complexities of immigration. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging opposing perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific policy agenda, but it does not necessarily aim for the betterment of society as a whole, given its divisive nature. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its polarizing language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.