Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement is a political claim about border security and immigration policy, which are significant public issues. It outlines specific actions and goals related to border management, suggesting a legislative approach to these issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the language used could be perceived as divisive or inflammatory, particularly in the context of immigration debates. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on enforcement and security measures without addressing the human aspects of immigration. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue with opposing views.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for specific policy measures, which could be seen as contributing to societal betterment from the perspective of those who support stricter border controls. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to advocate for policy changes, but the responsibility and integrity of the message could be questioned due to its one-sided nature.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.