The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the influence of foreign funding on academic institutions, a significant societal issue. The comment contrasts understanding with emotional response, implying a preference for rational analysis over emotional reaction.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a judgment about emotional responses, which could be seen as dismissive.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not actively promote understanding or empathy, as it contrasts understanding with feelings in a potentially divisive way.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it implies a hierarchy between understanding and feeling without fostering discussion.
[-1]